Fact:
In a motor accident by the rush driving
of the respondent, a number of articles in fancy shop were damaged. Kilari, who
had come to the shop to purchase fancy goods, received injuries.
Issue:
Whether the insurer was liable or not?
Judgment:
It was held that the owner was not
liable for the accident caused.
Reasoning:
The insurer was liable on the ground
that they entrusted vehicles only to licensed drivers.
No comments:
Post a Comment