Fact:
Defendant in his newspaper published a defamatory statement against the plaintiff and the plaintiff retorted with a counter attack.
Issue:
Whether there was any contemptuous damages or not?
Judgment:
Held that the plaintiff was awarded only one farthing It was.
Reasoning:
Contemptuous damages awarded in case the claim is unmeritorious.
Defendant in his newspaper published a defamatory statement against the plaintiff and the plaintiff retorted with a counter attack.
Issue:
Whether there was any contemptuous damages or not?
Judgment:
Held that the plaintiff was awarded only one farthing It was.
Reasoning:
Contemptuous damages awarded in case the claim is unmeritorious.
information is low
ReplyDelete