Fact:
The corporation in lying out a park
constructed a paddling pool in the bed of the stream and altered the natural
course of the stream. Because of extraordinary rainfall the stream overflowed
at the pond and flooded the railway corporation badly.
Issue:
Act of god would be applicable or not?
Judgment:
The appellants had
failed to establish any defense and corporation was liable and the defense of act
God could not succeeded.
Reasoning:
It is true that the
flood was of extraordinary violence, but floods of extraordinary violence must
be anticipated as likely to take place from time to time. The corporation
altered the natural course of stream, otherwise the great volume of water would
have been carried away by the stream in its natural course.
No comments:
Post a Comment