Monday, August 21, 2017

Limpus V. London General Omnibus



Fact:
The master told the servant not to race the car or overtake. But servant didn’t follow master’s order and then Servant made an accident.

Issue:
Here, who would be held liable muster or servant?

Judgment:
Master was be liable.

Reasoning:
Thought servant didn’t follow master’s the instruction as a manner of doing a work but the master was be liable.

No comments:

Post a Comment