Fact:
The Company had employed Lister as a Lorry driver who took his father with him as his mate.While he was backing the lorry he injured the father.the father sued the Company for damages.the Company then brought an action against Lister to recover damages.
Issue:
Whether the company was liable?
Judgment:
It was held that the company was entitled to recover.
Reasoning:
As to master’s right against servant the company was entitled to recover.
The Company had employed Lister as a Lorry driver who took his father with him as his mate.While he was backing the lorry he injured the father.the father sued the Company for damages.the Company then brought an action against Lister to recover damages.
Issue:
Whether the company was liable?
Judgment:
It was held that the company was entitled to recover.
Reasoning:
As to master’s right against servant the company was entitled to recover.
No comments:
Post a Comment