Fact:
In a motor accident by the rush driving of the respondent ,a number of articles in fancy shop were damaged .kilari, who had come to the shop to purchase fancy goods,received injuries.
Issue:
The issue is that whether the insurer was liable or not?
Judgment:
Insurer was held liable.
Reasoning:
drivers Liable the ground that they entrusted vechicles only to licensed.
In a motor accident by the rush driving of the respondent ,a number of articles in fancy shop were damaged .kilari, who had come to the shop to purchase fancy goods,received injuries.
Issue:
The issue is that whether the insurer was liable or not?
Judgment:
Insurer was held liable.
Reasoning:
drivers Liable the ground that they entrusted vechicles only to licensed.
No comments:
Post a Comment